Mar 22, 2009

Reader Stream

How does one use the internet?

The average person will probably check his/ her email (obsessively), use social networks like LinkedIn/ Facebook/ Orkut, perhaps Twitter or blog a bit, and when that's done go to a combination of websites that keep them up to date on matters of interest. For me that would be a smattering of blogs, news, movie reviews, and op-eds.

Now of course, I was spending ridiculous amounts of time going to multiple websites, poring over hundreds of articles and posts, trying to (and failing at) separating the good stuff from the chaff, and often ended up missing stuff I would've liked if I'd only noticed it.

My problem was partially solved a while ago, when K got me hooked on to Google Reader - a fantastic feed reader and aggregator. In a nutshell, it takes the RSS feeds for all your favorite websites and displays them to you in a single stream. You can save yourself multiple bookmarks/ trips to multiple sites however many times you do in a day. I heavily recommend checking it out if you haven't already.

That said though, now I have a new problem. I am over-informed. My 'trends' page on Reader tells me I sort through an average of ~100 posts in a single day. It doesn't (thankfully) tell me how many minutes/ hours a day I spend doing that. It is quite an addiction.

I also have this weird compulsive thing going on - much as with my email inbox I cannot bear to see unread items in the Reader queue. Each item must be read. Good items must be starred or shared... and finally I am over-informed and don't have a peer group of people who are reading what I'm reading (although poor wifey does get subjected to a continuous stream of updates). 

Anyway I figured since Reader lets me share items I think are interesting, I'd put the shared items feed on my blog (in the right hand column). Just another stream of information for those not yet overloaded :D Just so more people know what's on my mind...

Mar 17, 2009

Christians All

Something I've been thinking about for a while now...  

Here's the thing: we're all Christians without realizing it.

First up, the idea of an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient god is in itself a Judaeo-Christian-Islamic construct. Yes, I know both the Vaishnav and the Shaiva sects of hinduism have their own 'flavor' of monotheism, but come on - that's about a 22% slice of hindu philosophy. That Christians chose to steal from the Greeks and make Jehovah looks like Zeus (with the buff body and white hair and Gandalf beard as seen in Michaelangelo's work) is beside the point... heck, even Morgan Freeman (and Amitabh Bachchan in the misbegotten ripoff using said ripoff) have to dress up like a post-modern chic avatar of Zeus when playing the character.

Secondly, let's talk about swearing... I'm sure you knew that a lot of substitution swear words we use are "minced oaths"; meaning they are Christian oaths that have been... phonetically sterilized. Kind of like a poor doggie that got snip-snipped.

"Egad" says Mr Lodge of Riverdale... which stands for "By God".
"Zounds!" yells Jughead... which stands for  's wounds... God's Wounds... referring to that poor Hesoos guy and what he went through three days before Easter on a little hill...
"ods bodikins" goes the stiff upper lipped British refrain... meaning "by God's little body
Besides all these, you probably already knew that "Gosh", "Darn", "Gee" and "Heck" stand for God, Damn, Jesus, and Hell respectively?

Which brings me to hell... and heaven, and purgatory.

First of all, the Christian conception of the three is not in the Bible. No, credit for this wondrous creation goes to a Mr Dante Alighieri, who wrote the "Divine Comedy" and to a lesser degree, to a Mr John Milton, author of "Paradise Lost" and "Paradise Regained". You see before then, no one really associated Hell with fire (or even punishment necessarily). For Judaism, it was sufficient punishment for bad deeds to be sent to Purgatory after death and being denied the presence of God.

But I digress... my point is this: the very common Indian expostulating a vehement "go to hell" is using a Christian concept. The Hindu concept is that you get recycled, and the form you take in your next life depends on your karma quotient in the current life. A judge does do a balancing of good deeds and bad, but you get the result right away, not on Judgment Day. If you're lucky, you get moksha or mukti from this tiresome cycle... and few variants of Hinduism that I know of believe you join Zeus in heaven as a prize for good deeds (I may simply be under-informed).

"Narka lok" as the Hindu version of "hell" (more appropriately, the Indian version of Hades, which the Christians ripped off to build hell) is not the final destination for evil-doers. It is more appropriately a penitentiary, where one does penance. Yes, it does involve boiling oil and fire and brimstone in some variants, but one wonders if this was a case of the ancient world being a much smaller place than we think.

My point is this... Popular culture around the world is (not surprisingly) infused with elements from the three dominant world religions. I'm not saying that is a bad thing... nor am I recommending a Taliban-esque ban on cursing like a Christian or believing in Christian tenets - in the end when it comes to belief most of us are mongrels.

What I'm saying is I find it extremely interesting how we drink in things subconsciously when otherwise we are vehement about being teetotallers. That's all.

Mar 14, 2009

Stewart vs Cramer: Coda

So it is done... Stewart took Cramer and threw him around willy-nilly - only, he didn't do it for laughs but rather for pain. He pointed out the obvious: The 17 live hours a day juggernaut that is CNBC is more about entertainment than information. 

For those that haven't seen it yet, I embeddeth the links right here:

Unedited Interview - Part 1 Part 2 Part 3

But - what I'm blogging to say isn't all the above. Rather I wanted to highlight an earlier instance of Stewarts similar treatment of the news media - back in 2004 he appeared on CNN's "Crossfire", a show dedicated to left vs right brawling, and called the show "theater not debate" and the hosts "partisan hacks" to their face.

This is just so much fun I thought those that liked what he did with CNBC might like this too...



Oh by the way - "Crossfire" got cancelled a few months later.

Mar 12, 2009

Tabloid News vs. Intelligent Comedy

You look to a news channel to provide you with interesting information, perspectives, and the like right? And you look to a comedy/ entertainment channel for idiocy?

Well, you're on the wrong planet, man!

Case in point...

I tuned in to "Times NOW" and "India TV" the other day, at prime-time, to see if there was any news coming out of that bubbling pot of trouble called AfPak. To my utter chagrin the idiots were running news stories (and by stories I mean those serious, overly melodramatic pieces that feel like they were directed by a Manmohan Desai wannabe) like - 

a) Whether the world is going to end in 2012 (no doubt some executive producer finally saw the trailer for Roland Emmerich's latest effort at world destruction) and,
b) How the United States uses Area 51 to leverage alien technology in making spy planes and other cool stuff (no, India isn't that far behind when it comes to TV series seasons - we got the X-files back in the 90s and everything)

Needless to say, the presenters of said pieces were amateurish, but utterly earnest. The guy talking about Area 51 looked like he had just come up with the answer to life, the universe, and everything.  

The world is not big enough for the shivering and cringing I wanted to do.

Then in the morning, when I had finally woken from my depressed sleep, having lost all hope, I find the interwebz choked with stories about The Daily Show and John Stewart's takedown of CNBC. Here's a comedian, doing better news than all the jokers in all the news network in all the world.

His two takedowns of CNBC are not so much comedy gold as they are... conscientious reporting! If you haven't seen them yet, crawl out from under that rock and take a gander:


Now with Jim Kramer melting down in response, and finally booking a showdown with  Stewart on his own turf this is simultaneously must-see entertainment TV and perhaps the most relevant debate in the news media right now about the financial crisis. The question is simple: (and I riff on that movie I so badly want to see that the Indian censors won't ever let me): Who reports on the reporters?

So there you are folks... lesson for the day: for your news, go to Comedy Central. For comedy front and center, go to any darn news channel!

Oh, and don't miss the Kramer vs Stewart showdown (I'll be sure to post the linky here)

Famous Last Words

Yes - I know.

I said I was done blogging. Operative word being 'was'. There was no 'why' to my blogging there, toward the end. And without the 'why' my blogging was, well, pointless.

So there is a reason now...

I am out of touch with people as never before, and drinking down information feeds like they're about to run dry. That makes for a bad combination.

I need to Vent. Express. Ruminate and Pontificate. Puke. Whatever.

Further explanations, groans in response to half-chuckles/ snide remarks/ I-told-you-so's and the like in the comments for those who need them.

Without much further ado and self-referential crap, here... we... Go!